City vs city
Las Vegas, NV vs San Francisco, CA
- Rent is 58% lower in Las Vegas (median $1,563/mo vs $2,476/mo in San Francisco).
- Homes cost 226% less in Las Vegas ($428k vs $1.4M median value).
- On a $75k salary, you'd have about $1,158 more a month after taxes and rent in Las Vegas.
- Las Vegas has no state income tax on wages; San Francisco does.
- Schools rate higher in San Francisco (4.6/10 vs 3.4/10).
- San Francisco has less violent crime (4.9 vs 6 per 1,000 residents; the US rate is 3.6).
- San Francisco has milder winters (52°F vs 47°F average).
- Las Vegas gets more sun (294 vs 259 sunny days a year).
| Las Vegas | San Francisco | |
|---|---|---|
| Median rent | $1,563/mo | $2,476/mo |
| Median home value | $428k | $1.39M |
| Median household income | $74k | $141k |
| Left each month on $75k (after taxes and rent) | $3,570 | $2,412 |
| State income tax on wages | None | Yes |
| School rating | 3.4/10 | 4.6/10 |
| Violent crime | 1.7× the US rate | 1.4× the US rate |
| Summer average | 104°F | 70°F |
| Winter average | 47°F | 52°F |
| Sunny days a year | 294 | 259 |
| Walk score | 42 | 89 |
| Population | 660,400 | 830,235 |
Population, income, home value and rent: U.S. Census Bureau ACS. Taxes: single filer, 2026 federal and state rates, before any city income tax. Violent crime per 1,000 residents; US rate 3.6.
Not sure it's either one?
Tell the AI matcher your budget, job and dealbreakers, and get cities that fit, with the real numbers.
Find my city