City vs city
Omaha, NE vs San Francisco, CA
- Rent is 109% lower in Omaha (median $1,187/mo vs $2,476/mo in San Francisco).
- Homes cost 468% less in Omaha ($246k vs $1.4M median value).
- On a $75k salary, you'd have about $1,308 more a month after taxes and rent in Omaha.
- Schools rate higher in San Francisco (4.6/10 vs 2.5/10).
- Omaha has less violent crime (3.5 vs 4.9 per 1,000 residents; the US rate is 3.6).
- San Francisco has milder winters (52°F vs 23°F average).
- San Francisco gets more sun (259 vs 213 sunny days a year).
| Omaha | San Francisco | |
|---|---|---|
| Median rent | $1,187/mo | $2,476/mo |
| Median home value | $246k | $1.39M |
| Median household income | $73k | $141k |
| Left each month on $75k (after taxes and rent) | $3,720 | $2,412 |
| State income tax on wages | Yes | Yes |
| School rating | 2.5/10 | 4.6/10 |
| Violent crime | about the US rate | 1.4× the US rate |
| Summer average | 85°F | 70°F |
| Winter average | 23°F | 52°F |
| Sunny days a year | 213 | 259 |
| Walk score | 46 | 89 |
| Population | 488,837 | 830,235 |
Population, income, home value and rent: U.S. Census Bureau ACS. Taxes: single filer, 2026 federal and state rates, before any city income tax. Violent crime per 1,000 residents; US rate 3.6.
Not sure it's either one?
Tell the AI matcher your budget, job and dealbreakers, and get cities that fit, with the real numbers.
Find my city